Earthling ED: Vegan Hates Nature & Preaches Anti-Human Beliefs

Watch on YouTube · 2019-06-21 · 18 min

0:00 Hi everybody, the religious freak Earthling Ed He's out on the streets again, proving how ignorant he is.

[video] 0:08 I'm here at Harvard University today and I'm going to be asking Harvard students questions about equality and moral consideration and seeing what they think about... You're so freaking pale, man. ...into our circle of moral consideration as well. Sexy guy. So the first question I'm asking people is, do you think all humans should be granted kind of that same moral consideration? So yeah, I think certainly everybody is like, everybody deserves some sort of equality. Should we kind of consider all humans within our moral consideration and kind of grant a kind of a blanket equality to everyone to have the the right to life absolutely yeah and what is it about that's all he talks about religion attributes to humans possess that mean that we should be granted a right to life

[video] 0:48 Wow, okay, that's a tough one. I do think all humans should have an equal right to, yeah, life and liberty. So, I mean, I personally, I'm a vegetarian, and so I do feel, I personally feel like, you know, a connection with animals and whatnot. Yeah. But I think it's tough because then when we choose life forms in general, why do we draw the line in animals? We can think about the number of bacteria that our gut is killing every day. It seems like at some point we do end up drawing a line somewhere. And so I guess I'm not... Even though I personally would have a very tough time killing an animal or thinking about harming animals, I'm not sure that I would be comfortable imposing that on others who have decided that the line lies closer to humanity than...

[video] 1:34 um than myself it's interesting i guess the the difference in bacteria would be like the sentience and consciousness whereas i think for me the moral consideration of non-human animals is is that our moral code dictates that humans should be granted consideration because they're you know we're conscious sentient have individualistic experience of life but then the animals that we exploit also basically just so you understand what's going on here

1:57 Religions created morals. It's the rules that we are supposed to live by. We are supposed to treat human beings in a specific way. And because we are also animals, it should apply to all of the animals. Of course, vegans ignore that plant agriculture kills way more animals than any slaughterhouse out there. They don't care about that. They only care about the slaughterhouse footage shown in the documentaries that brainwashed them. Most of which is faked. This has been proven. They actually pay the workers to torture the animals. Who pays them? The companies, organizations behind veganism. Yes, that's really how twisted it is. It's messed up. Anyway, this is what they do to appeal to weak and emotional slaves. It's mentally ill people who fall for it. Religions are anti-nature. All of the morals are satanic.

2:58 That's just how it is. We are obligate carnivores and these man-made rules will only make human beings unhealthy. And this is what he doesn't talk about.

[video] 3:08 It's sort of a good point.

3:32 That's a reason why we keep cats and dogs as pets. We can only relate to carnivores.

[video] 3:38 Very few people have pets such as rabbits.

3:40 And they find them boring.

[video] 3:48 I guess that's the point, isn't it? It's like an arbitrary distinction between, and it makes sense for us to have closer alliances with our own species because it's easy, as you say, to empathize. But do you think that that kind of lack of ability to empathize somewhat demotes the value of an animal's life or a non-human animal's life? Or should they still be granted that right to life? All he's talking about is living by man-made rules.

[video] 4:33 It's very messed up.

4:35 That is enslavement. He wants humanity to be enslaved. This is what he's promoting.

[video] 4:41 Well, in the case of animals, it's very clear that animals have desires, Put the dead cat on your microphone next time. They socialize. Animal abuse and those kind of things, I think that that's like absolutely an exploitation and just a degradation of animal dignity. I guess their autonomy as well, right? Their autonomy as well, I guess, in some ways, yeah. What would be animal abuse? What would be an example of that? What does the word abuse, how do you define that word?

5:14 Of course we all know what Pony is getting into.

[video] 5:16 Depriving them of the things that they need to survive, that type of thing, yeah. What about the opposite of that? What about, say, when we take their life from them? Is that a form of abuse?

[video] 5:29 I think in some instances, yes. I don't think in all instances, but I do think in some instances it definitely can be abusive, yeah. Could you define an instance where it wouldn't be an abuse to take the life of an animal? I mean, I think different people obviously fall on different places of the spectrum morally, right? I think there are circumstances in which animals are, especially if you think, are we considering fish animals? I think people could imagine circumstances in which fish are allowed to free-range wild fish and are caught and people eat them. I wouldn't consider that abuse and I think there's a valid argument that that's not abusive. What would that argument be, do you think? We use the word moral. What would be the moral justification to consume animals?

[video] 6:25 They could live lives free of torture and free of abuse and at the same time humans could consume them. So if we had a big lush green pasture with cows grazing, we would then be morally justified to take them to a slaughterhouse. Is that the general thinking? I don't know. So the next question, I kind of expand it a little bit further.

6:54 There's no way to win an argument because if you follow religion, which 99% of people do, and yes, most of them call themselves atheists, they're super religious, You're never going to get anywhere with that. Morals were created to enslave us. That's why we learned them as kids already. There's a right and wrong, good and bad, blah, blah, blah. Has anybody ever heard of that in nature? No, of course not, because it's man-made ideas. In nature, you do what you want. You follow your instinct. When you believe in a right and wrong, which has been man-made, then you don't follow your instinct anymore. And this is what he's talking about. He's an absolute slave. He's been brainwashed big time. And most of the people he talks to, whether they call themselves atheists or Christians, all still follow the same religious beliefs as him.

7:50 So they cannot even win an argument with him because they already have the same beliefs. Only natural people can see through this. It's just ridiculous.

[video] 8:01 What about say non-human animals? Do they deserve a sense of moral consideration as well? Yeah, that's an interesting question. I think a lot of people think that there's kind of a correlation between intelligence and the possession of a soul and they kind of link their answer with that. I don't know that I believe that. You know, maybe there are alternatives in which, you know, those distinctions don't exist, but I don't know. Yeah, I think that's a very tough question. Could you maybe expand on what alternatives that would be? Interesting. Yeah, I mean, I guess I could envision a world, or at least the way that I choose to sort of envision relationships between humanity and animals is that, you know, we try our hardest to stay out of their way and respect their autonomy. Right.

[video] 8:51 But I don't know. I mean, I don't even know how feasible this is. I mean, I've not done so much research in this, but I don't even know how feasible it is in the context of domesticated animals at this point. So, like, you know, if we just, like, let them, you know, if we stopped mass-producing them or whatever, like, what, you know, certainly, like, living in the wild is not really an option for them anymore, right? And then, I don't know. So I think it makes it difficult to...

9:16 to especially the concept of evaluation like how do we evaluate here's the problem with these two he's a vegetarian which means that he eats eggs and dairy i suppose either way he's getting a lot of the animal nutrients which ed the anemic guy is not getting he's severely sick i also put him in epitome too the vegetarian doesn't understand that once the milk products would be gone, that he would be just as malnourished as Ed. Complete disconnection from nature.

[video] 9:48 animal's life as a human as useful for as a um you know object for humans and then how do we evaluate an animal's life and what that means like you know if it's not and uh and and i i guess to to to um to kind of understand whether an animal should be granted moral consideration is to work out whether they should be considered as an individual or as property in the eyes of the law that considers property, which creates a system where we can exploit them rather freely. I think humans have some level of dominion over animals and I think that there is a way that exists that you can do that rightly and you can do that without being abusive and exploitative. Let's say in a slaughterhouse. What happens to an animal in a slaughterhouse? They're killed, I assume. I don't know. They're killed, yeah. I mean, that's right. But I guess, like, how are they killed? Do you have any ideas of the methods?

[video] 10:45 I imagine it's a pretty bloody and kind of... By nature, I guess it is. So if they, let's say, cut their throats in a slaughterhouse, when I say the phrase, we cut an animal's throat, do you think that, objectively speaking, that would be seen as a violent act? I do think that's violent, yeah. But then at the same time, how do we take the life of an animal from them in a way that is...

11:06 Perfect example, he admits to being a Satanist. He said that by nature it's bloody, meaning that he is against nature. Just to clarify, in case there's anybody who follows Earthling Ed and believes that he is about nature, it should be clear, but to some people it's not especially the ethical vegans, because they're all about morals and whether they are Officially part of a religion or not, obviously, all of them are if they are part of veganism. It is a religion by every definition of the word, but even if it's some other which they consider an actual religion. Here he is, admitting that he's against nature.

[video] 11:50 So there's... By the way, the reason blood flows out of the animal

12:14 is to nourish and hydrate us. It's the best liquid food you could possibly drink. Of course, to a Satanist, that's cruel.

12:32 Because they don't care about human health.

[video] 12:36 And a lot of them are actually anti-human. So for them, of course, veganism is perfect because they can watch everybody get sick and die.

12:48 And they hate themselves, of course.

12:52 Veganism stems from self-hate.

[video] 12:55 What does the word humane mean?

[video] 12:58 You say like humane hunting or humane slaughter. We have to define what that word means to use it.

[video] 13:08 If I was to treat you humanely, I would be treating you in what manner? I guess, probably in the literal way, it's probably like, as is rightful to treat another human, but I guess... That's where it derives from, the word human. But I guess synonyms would...

13:24 It doesn't whatsoever. Humane derives from how humans are by nature, not by how religions define us. Of course, that's the way most people see it nowadays, and this is why it's so manipulative, because if you believe that Humane means to care about somebody, to treat them nice and so on. You get what it means. Then you automatically believe that that's how humans should be and you can easily confuse people with the word and manipulate them to get them to accept these kind of points. Humane just means the way human beings are, which means everything. So, for example, killing an animal is the most humane thing you could possibly do because it's our nature. So if you want to torture them, to adrenalize the blood before, then that's up to you, that's humane, because that's what humans do in nature.

14:22 Or if you want to kill them quickly, then that's also humane, it's up to you. But not killing them and doing what he's talking about, that's inhumane. It's very twisted and I don't expect any vegans to understand this, but When you live in a religious world, as most of us do nowadays, then you just don't understand this. Humane does not mean being kind and all of that bullshit. Humane also means being angry, killing and so on. Those are all humane things that humans do. An inhumane way to treat an animal would be, for example, if you find a lamb hurt quite badly on the sidewalk, And you bring it to a wet, which doesn't exist in nature, to heal it. That would be satanic because humans would always eat it in nature with no exceptions.

[video] 15:21 It would be like compassion, benevolence. Do you think there's a compassionate or benevolent way to take the life of an animal if we don't have to?

15:34 He says we don't have to. That's of course wrong. There's over 15 nutrients that you can't get from plants. So we have to, to be healthy. If you want to be unhealthy and die early like vegans... Yeah, but that's anti-nature.

[video] 15:52 That's where they get the consequences when purchasing products or Like meat or things like that if we were constantly reminded of the process that it probably you would see reduction people buying those products That's a really valid point. Do you think that morally most people are pussy? So there's a documentary called Dominion Which is it ties in nicely to what we were chatting about. There's also another documentary called land of hope and glory which is about Yeah, Oh land Almost all of the footage is fake.

16:24 It wouldn't even matter if it wasn't and you would have to simply buy it from different places and you should support local farms anyway.

16:34 So all of this is completely irrelevant anyway. These people aren't fighting for the change of how animals are treated. They're using this to tell people not to eat meat at all. It doesn't even make sense. Alright, so there you go. He completely ignores that you can't get over 50 nutrients from plants because, as you can see, he doesn't care about nature. Most likely he hates nature because most people who hate themselves also hate nature. They really don't like it. They don't like the world they live in and they want to change it. And they somehow magically, because they grew up in a city, don't understand that you can't escape nature. It will always catch up. If you would leave the city alone, it would be full of plants and animals after a while taking over because all that we do in everyday life is cut down the grass, trim the trees and so on.

17:32 So it doesn't take over, but that's only because of human interactions. Ed believes that human beings are not part of nature and that we can eat whatever we feel like, even though every animal only has one natural diet. which they have to eat to be healthy. There will never be a way around it. He's a modern-day Satanist. And by Satanism, I mean religions that are anti-nature. All of them are, but veganism is of course the top one. Thanks for watching, guys.