Professor Stick Got Stuck In His Religious Beliefs. Can't Think for Himself

Watch on YouTube · 2019-04-20 · 16 min

[video] 0:00 what's up i'm gonna watch professor stick's latest response to my video let's get straight to it remember the guy who said that cancer isn't bad for you but rather it keeps you alive yep he saw my response video and decided to make his own response this is exciting since i don't get many people who make videos calling me stupid oh the guy i'm surprised bless us i say i'm shaken i can't wait let's go what's up everybody this imbecile called professor stick

0:27 Made a response video to my cancer video. And it's just another one of those copy channels. There's many of these stick figure channels out there.

[video] 0:35 Hey man, that's not very nice. I'm not a copy channel. Am I?

0:39 He actually put on some clothes now. So he doesn't look like a stick figure. Who know that they are retarded, so they want to feel clever. It's just really funny to watch this and to read the comments. That's the main reason I'm doing this, for humor.

[video] 0:53 You guys heard him. Y'all are stupid fucks. Hey, what's up guys? So of course we're back to more cancer. And yet again, here's another guy claiming that cancer isn't bad for you, but actually good. Wow. Surprise, surprise. Yep. No surprises here. Just roll the clip. So once again, I'm using a fan art here. So it's easier to distinguish present me and past me. He also tends to play long segments of my video without talking. So I'm going to try to shorten it to the best of my ability, since you guys have already seen it and probably don't want to rewatch every little bit. So don't worry. And if you want to check out the entire video, the links will be in the description. All right. You totally don't understand this at all.

[video] 1:42 I don't know where you got your idea on what cancer is, but that certainly isn't the case, and I'm going to give a more detailed rundown here. Cancer always starts off with your own cells, and normally your cells are under control. Specifically, the growing speed of these cells. You have two general types of genes that, when mutated, can turn any regular cell into a tumor cell. That is, proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Proto-oncogenes are the ones that promote cell growth and cell division. Why do we talk about tumor cells? Totally not the point. He may be so stupid that he doesn't realize

[video] 2:17 The tumor cells are dead cells and cancer cells are something completely else. It could be, I'm not quite sure. It really looks like it, wow. Wow.

[video] 2:32 There could be a crucial mutation in one of these genes. Straight up retard. I'll just say it. Once one of these proto-oncogenes can express itself to overactivity, it becomes an oncogene and promotes the uncontrollable proliferation of the cell, which is a property of cancer. On the other end of the spectrum, you have tumor suppressors. These are genes that work to stop cellular growth, which can be done by either inhibiting growth signals or simply by self-destructing the cell via apoptosis. Plenty of examples exist, but just to name a few, P53, the guardian of the genome, P10, inhibits the activity of oncogene, PI3.

3:00 You do understand that nobody gives a shit about this. You're reading from Wikipedia. Nobody thinks you're clever except for a few retards who watch your videos.

[video] 3:08 Most of them don't understand what you're saying. This is pointless. There's nothing to do with the video response.

[video] 3:21 Once an oncogene becomes overactive, it promotes the growth and division of the cell. When the cell divides a lot, it gives greater chances of more mutations because mutations happen every time a cell replicates its DNA, which can mutate at another oncogene or tumor suppressor, and the vicious cycle continues. Eventually, one of these tumor cells will get past both the apoptotic signals and the immune system, where it eventually settles and multiplies by itself. Completely irrelevant and unrelated to the video. Which is how each individual tumor cell can be so people watching videos don't even understand it probably because they don't understand what he's saying They have mutated in crucial areas that resulted in their uncontrollable growth and to answer your question beforehand Because later on in the video you accused me of using other people's opinions rather than proving fact This is proven fact scientists have worked with cancer in laboratories for so long. I used to be part of a Wow

4:10 A fact is something you sense. Okay? With your senses. Human senses. You can't sense somebody's opinion. Anything you read is man-written. It's an opinion by every definition of the word. How can you not understand what a fact is? A proven fact.

4:34 Something that somebody saw. How do you know what they saw if they tell you? You can't. And you're saying that because they believe something and write about it, it's a proven fact. What the fuck? This is way beyond retarded. Really. Any child could understand what the word fact means.

5:00 It's not an opinion. You're talking about opinions. Okay. This is crazy. Wow. This is better than I thought. It was worth doing this. Let's continue.

[video] 5:14 There's books written about this. You can read cancer. It's not a disease. It's a survival mechanism where we want to live. It's very well researched.

[video] 5:33 Stop reading books written by people who don't know anything about cancer. I suggest reading research papers. You don't even know them. Detail exactly what their methods are and how they reach certain conclusions. No bias whatsoever.

5:44 He also studied it.

[video] 5:46 No idea what he's talking about. I don't know your exact definition of unnatural lifestyle, but surely there are people out there that fit the category I just mentioned.

6:00 There's people who live it. That doesn't make any sense at all. Again, if somebody lives and smokes for 10 years, then it's simply going to take a while for them to develop it, and we don't know what kind of cigarettes they're smoking. Some have a lot of toxins, for example. Some simply smoke natural tobacco. So you would need to give an actual example of that. What is this?

[video] 6:21 It's a joke. There is only one definition. They don't? Yet? Of course. Eventually, all of them do.

[video] 6:43 I've talked to many people. He again gives no cases whatsoever.

[video] 7:07 Ah, I don't know if you actually pay attention to what I'm saying there, but survival rates are based on many factors. Living long with benign tumors can be common, but cancer by definition is only when it becomes malignant. Living long with cancer is a different story. Perhaps someone could live indefinitely with cancer, but it's not something you should expect. Pay attention! No one cares if you've talked to people who have lived long with a benign tumor or with cancer without- You showed some aggression. Some aggression went through the soy, somehow.

[video] 7:35 that was cool yes your body does indeed have the proper mechanisms to keep you in place but you have to understand what cancer is it's when cells disobey the body's orders due to one or a few central mutations so by definition it's sort of an error that happened with your body your body isn't perfect after all think of genetic diseases autoimmune diseases cancer is not much different Where's the proof that our body isn't perfect? Where's the proof that our bodies aren't perfect? I just named a bunch of examples of our bodies not being perfect. Autoimmune diseases. You know, when your immune cells attack... Damaged gut? Genetic diseases, where you're just born with something like Down syndrome. That's from vaccines and toxins.

8:11 There's no such thing in nature. Nobody in nature has autoimmune disorders or Down syndrome. Why would they simply mutate? It's because something is triggering it and these are the toxins or whatever else they're doing that is unnatural, right? Because in nature, people don't get cancer. If a dog is fed an unnatural diet, it's going to get cancer. A lot of dogs nowadays are dying from cancer.

[video] 8:40 Mutations aren't something your cells do willingly to adapt or combat certain things. Mutations are mostly random changes in DNA that results from error. For example, during DNA replication, polymerases could accidentally add on the wrong nucleotide, and that is a mutation. A nucleotide could also be added or missed, which could cause an entire frameshift on codon reading during translation. How about some external factors, like the sun? UV radiation causes a specific type of dimerizing mutation where double cysteines neighboring each other can covalently bond. Or what about oxidative mutations caused by free radicals? Like I mentioned in the original video, so many things are carcinogenic and you can't ever avoid mutations. They happen, and they happen randomly at random locations. Now, your cells have mechanisms to minimize mutation rates such as proofreading enzymes that lower mutation rates after DNA replication, because mutations aren't wanted or needed by the body. If what you say is true, that mutations are purposely done by the cells, why are there mechanisms in place to prevent mutations? Our bodies aren't even close to being perfect. The body does it by itself, technically the point when you're exposed to sunlight. How is that relevant?

[video] 9:40 The immune system has specific mechanisms in place to prevent cancer from spreading or growing, and to all around eliminate them. Why would the body have a mechanism like that in place if cancer is something it deliberately created?

9:52 Again, where is the proof? You have zero proof for anything you say. There's never been a case. There's never been a record of this. There's nothing. There's zero proof of what you're saying.

[video] 10:02 I wanted to keep the original video short and without anything overly advanced, but you're leaving me no choice. The immune system fighting tumor cells is one of the most basic knowledge we possess in regards to this field. It's been studied extensively and is now one of the most interesting topics when it comes to treatment for cancer. The battle between tumor cells and immune cells is very, very fascinating in regards to the mechanism... Who said? tumor cells. Do you have voices in your head? Nobody's talking about tumor cells. He really doesn't get it whatsoever.

[video] 10:41 This is a classic pathway for not only cancer cells, but also regular invaders. However, unlike regular invaders, cancer has ways to fight back on multiple levels, which I won't go over today since that point is irrelevant. Example 2. Natural killer cells are immune cells that specialize in killing viral infected cells and tumor cells. Normally, healthy cells express an MHC class 1 molecule. Exactly. Tumor cells, or cells that are about to become tumors...

11:04 He doesn't understand it whatsoever. The point of those immune cells, which are white blood cells, yes, made in the bone marrow from saturated animal fat, which you think is unhealthy. They are supposed to kill the dead cells and get rid of them. That's the point. And this has nothing to do with cancer cells. There's no case, nothing, there's nothing that's ever been studied of healthy cancer cells being destroyed by immune cells because they are helping you. Those are damaged cells you're talking about. Infected by virus, damaged cell. That's why the immune cells help. Wow. Crazy.

[video] 11:49 Express certain stress proteins instead and have lower MHC1 molecules, attracting natural killer cells to eliminate them. Third, you also have cytotoxic T cells, which are activated by antigen presentation by macrophages or dendritic cells, and they bind to the target cancer cells to destroy them. The mechanism to this is actually very- Damaged cells! Cytotoxic T-cells release a protein called Fas-ligand, which bind to Fas on the target cell. This receptor then triggers a downstream apoptotic pathway involving many other proteins, such as caspases, which ultimately causes the target cell to self-destruct. Cytotoxic T-cells also release perforin and granzyme B, which also causes apoptosis. These are pathways which seem very scary in the diagram, but is actually relatively easy to understand. Anything being activated here are generally tumor suppressors. You have no proof whatsoever. Wow.

[video] 13:01 He's in denial or mentally ill.

13:03 This alone proves how fucking stupid these viewers are. They believe anything. This is religious. I have actual proof for it. You can read the books.

[video] 13:12 No, no, no. No reading random books, read scientific papers, or go to college.

13:17 The actual thing that's killing all the people diagnosed with cancer are the treatments.

[video] 13:23 There's such a slave of authority. That's all you can appeal to. They say that the treatment is pretty much no way to heal them. It warns people they're going to die from it.

[video] 13:40 How dare you talk over me! Absolute blasphemy! Look, the treatments will hurt both cancer cells and your own cells, due to the fact that cancer is basically just your regular cells gone rogue. But certain treatments can take advantage of some differences, such as the fact that cancer grows incredibly quickly. Many of the drugs administered in chemotherapy do just that, but you can't get it without suffering some of the side effects. And overall, you know, this depends on what type of treatment you receive. Most of the time is not a pretty process. Your chances of survival could be low if you have very advanced cancer, or if you yourself are very old. At the end of the day, it's a trade-off. Do you want to make some sacrifices to treat your cancer? And dying on the surgery table is part of the risk. But of course, you shouldn't be jumping into these risks unless you understand what the doctor tells you. The ultimate goal of these treatments is to eliminate cancer. You make it seem as if these treatments have a primary purpose of just killing you, which simply isn't the case. Right. That's exactly the purpose.

14:36 i don't care to argue this because i don't promote smoking but most likely he's talking about the pesticides that they use to grow tobacco with and also the sugar that they put in cigarettes not what actually naturally occurs in tobacco so it's irrelevant but whatever

[video] 14:52 Uh, no, that's most definitely not what I'm talking about. I'm glad you don't promote smoking, but your idea on what is bad about tobacco isn't 100% correct. Sure, the, quote, unnatural substances such as pesticides can indeed be very harmful and increase the risk of cancer, but the natural parts of tobacco aren't great either. Nicotine, for example, is found naturally in tobacco plants, and it is the primary reason why smoking is addictive. It binds to many acetylcholine receptors in the parasympathetic nervous system, but more importantly, it can promote the growth of cancer by exhibiting angiogenic properties, activating growth factors, inhibiting apoptosis, etc. Other carcinogens found in tobacco include formaldehyde, chromium, acetaldehyde, benzene, arsenic, and so forth.

15:31 All of which are not naturally occurring. Nice.

[video] 15:34 But whatever, in no way do we support smoking. What you say kills people.

15:40 What he's saying is that we should eliminate free speech, even though he is wrong. That is against free speech. You said dismiss those books and only listen to authority.

[video] 16:02 He's reading you're absolutely against speech in every way This is so sad you're trying to sound clever, but you're just reading somebody's opinion literally that's what you're doing You little shit. This isn't someone else's opinion. This is proven fact that is corroborated by scientific research. You're a fucking joke. Oh my god. What a fucking loser. I'm for real. Yeah. Way too much garbage in one video.

16:48 Idiot.